A real and serious question for @AIPAC :
In light of this statement, what Israeli steps might actually warrant a change US-Israel relationship?
Pretty sure the answer is a resounding “NOTHING” to bd expressed in no response to this. Prove me wrong! https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-aipac-annexation-should-not-change-u-s-israel-relationship-1.8844267 …
-
-
? In "pretext of being temporary" the word inserts critical distance re:10 year annexations pending peace process, wariness they might become permanent. Having no "pretext of being temporary"--declaring permanent ownership--is even worse than stating the pretext
-
After more than 5 decades of a people living under armed occupation, it's hard to take so benign a view of the pretexts that what is being done is temporary.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.