You could say the same thing about Protocols of the Elders of Zion or any other dishonest garbage. Shame on you. Lies are lies.https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/1257393436895916034 …
-
-
It is. It's central premise is objectively a lie. A lie. Scholars on the left, right and center say it's bullshit. If "science" & objective facts mean anything, not only would't she win a Pulitzer but she and everyone who worked on it would be fired and unempoyable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even the Protocols of the Elders of Zion made more of an attempt at plausible argumentation than Jeet Heer does; they were refuted by men who marshaled actual facts and counterarguments against them—as Sean Wilentz & Co did with the 1619 Project.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s not Klavan’s (sp?) point. He’s saying that the essential value of a thing is not determined by how much conversion it‘a existence generates. He’s using “Protocols...” as evidence of that point. You seem to be deflecting from defending the premise of your argument.
-
*conversation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are correct. The Protocols of Elders of Zion have been on the forefront of conspiracy theorists for over 100 years. 1619 will be totally forgotten by the end of this week.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.