epigenetics has allowed Lamarck a vague dead cat bounce.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
See here: (The Fifth Head of Cerebus is clearly Lamarckian, by the way -- very obvious when you read it with Lamarck in mind): https://www.gwern.net/docs/fiction/1992-jordan.pdf …
- Show replies
-
-
-
Science has always trended in the direction of finding that humans are less important and powerful than they want to think they are. If we weren't such a narcissistic species we'd learn to take that as a prior.
-
Man, all I have to do is look up at a clear night sky.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Does epigenetics fit into the Lamarckian spectrum?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cf. also Lysenkoism. Part of it, I think, is the desire for one's revolution to encompass all aspects of life (e.g. post-French Revolution, literally renaming the months of the year, redefining all weights and measures, or Pol Pot's "Year Zero")
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Duh, because their dads were Lamarckians.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are an idiot. This is complete nonsense as a take on what Hayek was talking about.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good point. Burkhardt's 1970 (and beyond) work is the main academic canon on this sort of thing but he studied Freud in the context of the 1920-1950 period mainly - not so much 1960s and 1970s.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.