1. Since Russian stuff is likely to keep coming up can we get some perspective on it? As best we know, Russian gov't invested in troll farms in 2016 & now - these had (to extent it can be measured) a negligible impact. The problem is Trump's response https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/23/politics/intelligence-briefer-russian-interference-trump-sanders/index.html …
-
-
You...don't know that Jeet.
-
We have pretty good evidence from the polls.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
She ran a horrible campaign
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
also her poor campaign
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Man, this take really hurts my heart.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It all helped keep the election close, & pushed up unfavorables about Hillary. Of course the NYT did its bit to promote all the anti-Hillary tropes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Hilary's emails" did a lot of damage. I think a lot of people never really understood how that broke down into several distinct if related phenomena (the FBI investigation, the Podesta hack, etc). There was just a general miasma of "Hilary's emails" in the media for months.
-
Exactly this. You can't separate the effect on the average voter of the hacked emails vs. Comey's last-minute announcement about HRC's emails.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Actually the drip drip drip of Podesta’s emails did lots of damage, as did the campaign team and the candidate herself with her Goldman Sachs stuff and her deplorables remark. A real team effort.
-
Jeet just doesn't think hack an email account and strategically leaking its content is bad enough to mention...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.