This is a fascinating interview because it's so un-fascinating. Bowser sticks to the line that she's supporting Bloomberg because he has the best chance of beating Trump, and waves away the questions about stop-and-frisk and harassment allegations. https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/why-dcs-mayor-endorsed-michael-bloomberg …
That's a convincing argument for highly motivated Dems. No so much for millennials (especially millennial POC): the very people that stayed home in 2016.
-
-
I agree. And as I've said to you, I think that - and the possibility that WWC will be alienated by his anti-gun, anti-soda positions - are the real risks of his candidacy.
-
I'm coming around to the idea that the only candidate with real enthusiasm in the Democratic primary might be the candidate to nominate. I didn't think a clown like Trump had a chance in 2016. Maybe Bernie has a chance in 2020.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.