1. Very interesting @IChotiner interview with Michael Lind about Lind's attempt to craft a high-brow Trumpism (although that's perhaps not how Lind would describe it).
-
-
5. Lind: cultural shapers & post-college are managerial elite. Burnham: “Who hires and fires whom? How many men can Norman Mailer or Walter Cronkite set in motion when he picks up the telephone , compared to Harold Geneen or What’s-His-Name at the top of IBM? Come now.”
Show this thread -
6. Burnham, as befits an ex-Marxist admired by Trotsky himself, had a far more materialist & economic understanding of managerial elite power than Lind. Lind's ideas aren't from Burnham but reheated 1970s neo-con "New Class" discourse.
Show this thread -
7. So why is Lind wrongly citing Burnham rather than the 1970s neo-cons (Kristol, Moynihan) who theorized New Class Because Lind wants to jump on Trump bandwagon & Burnham is (via Samuel Francis) much admired by paleo-con Trumpists. It's all marketing, not intellectual history
Show this thread -
8. Anyways, you can read the Lind interview here and keep in mind that what Lind is saying about Burnham is -- to use the politest possible term -- bullshit.https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/michael-lind-on-populism-racism-and-restoring-democracy …
Show this thread -
4. (Revised) 4. Here's Burnham in 1978 (reviewing Alfred Chandler's great Visible Hand) arguing that the managerial elite are the people who actually run the large corporations, not novelists and media people!pic.twitter.com/7rZawlUrJB
Show this thread -
9. One way to think about all this is that a lot of New Class theory (and, on the left, PMC theory) is about blaming the ills of oligarchy on a subset of the junior partners of oligarchy. It's the socialism of foolish pundits.https://twitter.com/rortybomb/status/1225509036659007488 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Nice link to "new class." The share of national income that goes to the top 20% to top 3% (i.e. UMC excluding the rich) is unchanged between 1978 and now. The range above that is where the inequality growth has been, escalating the further you go up.
- Show replies
-
-
-
What are your thoughts on Chandler? I've considered reading him
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.