Another way of looking at dual NYT endorsement: For years, it got to endorse two candidates for president, one in each party. It could present a nuanced front btwn the two. Now, and for foreseeable future, there is no serious GOP to engage with. Solution: two Dem endorsements.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, it isn’t. It is a terrible point. It is the “moral victories mean more than electoral outcomes” view of politics. How you gonna say “there is no serious GOP to engage with” when the GOP controls the Senate and White House?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ha ha ha ha ha
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah. Because
@TheDemocrats are so serious with their cancel student debt, free Medicare for all, Russia Collusion, Green New Deal, abortion up until birth, ban all guns, open bathrooms for all, refusal to believe there are only two genders, etc. Such a serious party!

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.