It's hard in very specific disciplines that had "issues" until the later half of the century, makes citing old work and avoiding them hard, but modern people? Fucking not even slightly, unless you also are.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Was he a kooky pseudo-intellectual before the Trump era? I might have heard the name, but don’t recall anything else.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"it's" vs "its" is a mistake , "citing a white supremacist " vs "not citing a white supremacist" is an endorsement
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it possible to discuss the results of IQ tests without being a eugenicist?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How can someone so...”educated”...not get that saying a group is better or smarter because of their genetic line is EXACTLY THE SAME AS SAYING THAT ANOTHER GROUP IS WORSE OR DUMBER BECAUSE OF THEIR GENETIC LINE .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And to think I thought eugenics had disappeared in the late 19th century.
-
It was strong in the 1920s-40s.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Clearly Stephens accidentally cited Harpending because he believed Harpending to be s "good" eugenicist and not a "bad" eugenicist
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.