So here's why I think this much-hyped paper - "The Justinianic Plague: An Inconsequential Pandemic?" is deeply wrong. This matters because its approach is superficially empirical and quantitative, but the data fundamentally doesn't speak to the problem they want it to.https://twitter.com/Patrick_Wyman/status/1206630889666400256 …
-
-
If you're interested in a more historical approach to this question, please read our history article in
@PastPresentSoc that doesn't focus on data:https://academic.oup.com/past/article/244/1/3/5532056 … -
Rather pricey...
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.