"What's true? Who knows!"
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Everyone should listed to this 1 month old account with 4 followers. Everyone
pic.twitter.com/MQIgFvyk44
End of conversation
-
-
-
The problem is they are no longer calling out bad faith arguments. Seems the source is more important than the argument being made.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well then wouldn’t you say...it’s about time? Bold measures should address bold corruption.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fairness doesn’t require “both-sidesism” & objectivity is a fanciful goal. Finding the highest quality information is not. Imagine NYT, or any great newspaper, pretending it had to consider “both sides” in covering the Civil War or World War II. NYT is making itself irrelevant.
-
You could look it up and see. NYT published since 1851.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They just don't seem to understand how wrong and harmful their attitude is in our current situation. Maddening.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Except that the both sides framework is Definitely not objective.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn’t that, um, fucking disastrous?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.