Honest question: is this in any way defensible or does is it as hideous as it seems?https://twitter.com/nytpolitics/status/1204533600537972736 …
-
-
I'd guess "no." since women aren't. and LGTBQ aren't. maybe there's some other "minority" def? really thought women were "protected" class but I'll volunteer I 've no clue McGough's point w/ this ... so I'm likely not anyone authoritative who should be chiming in here
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Natives have been recognized as nationalities going back to the earliest days of European settlement, when England, France, Spain etc. entered into treaties with Native nations.
End of conversation
-
-
-
No, but Jews have always considered ourselves a nation/people/tribe with a distinct culture, language, etc and not simply a group bound together by belief and ritual. Our scripture refers to Jews as אם ישראל - the nation/people of Israel. It never refers to us as a religion.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No, but the other minorities are already named in Title VI - so black Americans would be protected via the "race" designation. They wouldn't require the nationality designation in order to be protected.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.