there's an entire mode of journalism and twitter discourse that's "dumb person says x about y, but historians say z about y and are smart, not dumb" as if there's some completely consensus version of the truth agreed to by "historians"
-
-
This. There’s lots of disagreement, but it’s also not the case that any serious historian is arguing for the PragerU position on anything.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.