1. I have to say, I thought I'd never want to read another word on Scorsese & Marvel movies. I was wrong. This Scorsese op ed is excellent. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/04/opinion/martin-scorsese-marvel.html#click=https://t.co/LjH5BF1qdE …
-
-
5. As journeymen artists, Colon & Heck were among the first artists Stan Lee brought on when the superhero line was expanding beyond even the prolific abilities of Jack Kirby & Steve Ditko.
Show this thread -
6. Anyways, Colan (Sp!)& Heck were fine artists but they weren't natural superhero artists like Kirby & Ditko. Colan in particular seemed constrained by superheroes, since his shadowy style suited horror & gothic stories more. He did find a niche in Daredevil, Batman & Dracula.
Show this thread -
7. The point is that Colan & Heck adapted (as other artists did) to the new domination of superheroes as best they could. Marvel made Kirby their "house style." Some artists could adapt to that, some couldn't. But ideally there would have been greater genre diversity for artists
Show this thread -
8. Another artist who came to have doubts about the dominance of a single genre owned by two companies was Jack Kirby, who did more to create the superhero genre than anyone else.
Show this thread -
9. Late in life Kirby (working with Steve Gerber) created a series called Destroyer Duck which parodied Marvel Comics as GODCORP LTD. It had the slogan: "Grab it all, own it all, drain it all." That could be Disney 2019.pic.twitter.com/iHNayQRxcl
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Colan in the 40s, Heck in the 50s. And I don’t know if it’s autocorrect or what, but you seem to consistently misspell Colan.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.