1. This "Tulsi Gabbard is being groomed to be a Russian asset" thing is another depressing example of how a subset of centrists & liberals have allowed CIA cosplaying to replace the actual work of politics.
-
-
4. Which is not to defend Gabbard's politics. She's an Islamophobic ultra nationalist who wants "war on terror" to be fought with drones & commandos. But that's congruent enough with centrism that she doesn't get attacked on it.
Show this thread -
5. Some more thoughts on the real trouble with Tulsi. https://www.thenation.com/article/clinton-tulsi-gabbard/ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Of course, Clinton did not call Gabbard a Russian asset at all (she labeled Jill Stein an asset). She expressed a belief that Russians are grooming Gabbard for a third party campaign, presumably by ginning up phantom support for such an effort with their troll farms.
-
But that would be actually listening to Hillary, and apparently that’s too much work for most people.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
from what I've seen the main evidence Gabbard is Russian asset is her consistent parroting of Kremlin talking points?
-
Which are? Non-interventionism?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Your 'logic' here is ridiculous. RU bots support Tulsi. Hillary attacked her, the opposite of what RU bots did.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.