First of all "they love reading balzac and trollope, read the financial press, listen to orchestral music and operas" basically describes Marx and Engels (if you leave off Trollope). So it's just a case that some Marxists continue to share the habits of the founders of Marxism.
-
-
Show this thread
-
But it's not just a matter of Marxists inheriting Marx's taste. There's a tradition of leftists loving reactionary/conservative writers. Marx/Engels on Balzac, Lukacs on Mann, Jameson on F.M. Ford & Wyndham Lewis, Anderson on Anthony Powell, Delany on Heinlein.
Show this thread -
I think the core explanation is that reactionary writers like Balzac are very sensitive to historical change (their work is a mourning for a lost world). Marxists appreciate this sense of history without sharing the nostalgia for the lost world.
Show this thread -
Engels appreciation of Balzac actually makes this point beautifully. It's Balzac's rich historical consciousness and textured understanding of social class that spoke to Marx & Engelspic.twitter.com/EnLEM6VTY4
Show this thread -
Tangentially, someone should write about the paradox of how the vey Tory novelist Anthony Powell is loved by leftists (Anderson, Tariq Ali, Hitchens, Pinter) & often derided by his fellow reactionaries (Muggeridge, Larkin, Naipaul, Auburn Waugh).
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"all the things i don't like are the same thing, actually"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the legacy of Adorno, isn't it?
-
No, of Marx himself.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Relative autonomy?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
why are you even treating this as a serious argument
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.