Setting aside basic issues that (a) Chomsky's "endorsement" of the book was 25 years ago, (b) it was not a straightforward endorsement, (c) Chomsky's views have changed significantly since then, and (d) linguistics has changed significantly since then... 1/2
-
-
Again, only if “gestalt” is in the domain of use not governed primarily by academics. And (again) that’s different than your condescending bullsh*t about citing Chomsky/Pinker as authorities.
-
Twitter is not a domain of use governed by academics -- thank god.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And you have to ask which academic experts you want to talk about. In English-language psychology, the term "gestalt" does invoke the idea of a whole over and above its parts (seeing a picture of a tree rather than the pixels that make up the image, for example.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.