Yup. And for a writer famously rebuked for her unreadability, Butler’s review is clear as a bell.https://twitter.com/EricLevitz/status/1176288852950028288 …
-
-
I agree. But she also gets her share of jargon in there too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This book review was good but sometimes the seeming clarity of these works can be an illusion, see, e.g., this critique of her account of Levinas in Parting Ways …https://jewishphilosophyplace.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/faceless-palestinian1.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There aren't many easy jargon free books about linear algebra either
-
Yes. Eagleton used to make that argument about literary theory.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
My female lit professor who was into the entire Continental pantheon said Butler was gibberish, but made her required reading anyway.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.