1. F.A. Hayek in 1947, criticizing denazification. “It is scarcely easier to justify the prevention of a person from fiddling because he was a Nazi than the prevention because he is a Jew.” It's worth unpacking this a little. https://twitter.com/zeithistoriker/status/1172516420917354496 …
-
-
5. So, what would be the argument for not allowing a Nazi to be a member of the philharmonic orchestra in 1947. Well, membership of the Nazi party wasn't just a matter of ideas but also actions & benefits: supporting genocide & benefitting from looting of Jewish property.
Show this thread -
6. If you're a Nazi party member in 1947, then it's highly likely that in previous decade you received some perk for you party membership -- some extra rations, access to loot, a job promotion. Membership had its privileges. But for Hayek, it's all just a matter of ideas
Show this thread -
7. Of course, Hayek's great ally in Austrian economics, Ludwig von Mises, was even more explicitly pro-fascist.https://twitter.com/MetroidThief/status/1172570243136442368 …
Show this thread -
8. Anyways, thanks to the Cold War and the protests of people like Hayek, denazification was soon ended and some real monsters escaped justice.
Show this thread -
9. “It is scarcely easier to justify the prevention of a person from fiddling because he was a Nazi than the prevention because he is a Jew.” When people talk about a libertarian to alt-right pipeline, they might want to ponder Hayek's role.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Worthwhile for readers to read entire article instead of a quote that lacks context under which it appeared. Articles as a whole seems similar to below article about Iraq's de-Baathification.https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/03/201331055338463426.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.