This was hilarious when it was just a tweet, rather than the thinking of a jury at a prestigious film festival.https://twitter.com/Th3BigWood/status/1166763938702401539 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Another example of me being wrong. I read Dark Knight Returns & Watchmen when they first came out & thought, "this is interesting but it's a terminal moraine, an artistic dead end. Superheroes work best when they are bouncy, fun, all-ages entertainment."
And graphic novels exploded around the same time, bringing the generic diversity to comic books
More pirates! Just like 1986 suggested we could have had! On a more serious note, this is a question I have set my film students for the semester. Why superheroes? ('Because blockbusters' is not a sufficient reply, since really that could be a lot of things.)
CGI plus existence of 50 years worth of CGI-friendly interlocking narratives that perfect franchise grist plus audience of millions who encountered some of these narratives over last 50 years plus post-9/11 search for redemption narratives.
I sincerely hope it's great and not the incel superhero movie it looks like. Venice insisted on Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, and Nate Parker all being there, so I hope "Joker" is more than the logical extension of their "MeToo has gone too far fest."
isn't it a little early to be attempting to throw the 2020 election? 





Read French comics.
My thought was that too many comics, movies and TV shows all line evil up on one side and heroes up on the other, the heroes fight for authority and the villains against it, propagandizing the viewer to believe the choice is clear, always support the status quo.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.