Definitely not how I’d describe the Times other conservative columnists. Been reading them for years, absolute garbage. Stephens is the logical end result.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Assuming things not in evidence. Both are just able to use Big Words more consistently than Stephens, but all three are thick as shit. any niceness only extends to their peers and then barely.
-
At least with Douthat he has some kind of consistent underpinning for his views. Brooks is just a complete moron. He's got the same bland, centrist views as Stephens, just somehow doesn't manage to be so offensively hypocritical when talking about various ethnic groups.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Douthat unironically supported Le Pen on the front page of the NYT. Jeet is just going full on NYT apologist today.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The latter is the critical part. Which begins at the ability to good-faithedly comprehend the opposing view, which is miles beyond Bret both intellectually and ethically.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t know about Douthat, but that is definitely not the case with Brooks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Weeeellll...lets not get outta hand here
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.