i wouldn't do this, but one could respond with a "why not both" gif.
-
-
"[I]s there not a considerable danger lest they [the poor majority] should throw upon the possessors of what is called realized property, and upon the larger incomes, an unfair share, or even the whole, of the burden of taxation?" JS Mill
-
"These [Chinese] interferences [into the opium trade] are objectionable, not as infringement on the liberty of the producer or seller, but on that of the buyer" - JS Mill
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.