my takeaway from this little controversy is that guys like this have no real awareness of either the historical work on display in the package (his scoffing at Kruse’s work on segregation in Atlanta is something) or of black political thought, periodhttps://theweek.com/articles/859776/new-york-times-surrenders-left-race …
How can you know if NY Times over-reached its conclusions since, as you admit, you haven't read the articles?
-
-
I take the statements in the headlines and accompanying text at face value.
-
But you can't evaluate the evidence and arguments which are presented not in the headlines but in the text. I literally don't know how to respond to someone who has strong opinions about stuff he refuses to read.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'll say it differently: The NYTimes overreached in the conclusions it stated in its headlines and accompanying text in the 1619 Project.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.