1. We need to game out the fact that if either Sanders or Warren is the nominee, some ghoulish billionaire (either Bloomberg or someone else) will do a third party run as a "centrist"https://twitter.com/adamcbest/status/1160607727229579264 …
-
-
And that's why the Russians are supporting her.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I would argue Clinton loses both 92 and 96 without Perot.
- Show replies
-
-
-
oh she is totally going to run with dark Russian money.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She's so obviously a spoiler and the fact that Dems aren't doing anything about it is insane. I want to ask Warren if she has a plan for Tulsi Gabbard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gabbard is not going to run 3rd party.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She'd probably syphon votes from trump more than the left.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She seems to have pretty emphatically knocked that idea down: "I will support the eventual nominee to defeat Donald Trump." https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/08/tulsi-gabbard-kamala-harris-2020-1452578 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I still don’t understand her reason for running. There’s no GOP senate seat for her to pivot toward after dropping out. Maybe governor in 22? She has no constituency, she isn’t left enuf for the left - her positions aren’t ideologically coherent. Is it just to serve as spoiler?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does she have any real support, though? I guess as an alternative to Biden, she could have a bit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.