1. We need to game out the fact that if either Sanders or Warren is the nominee, some ghoulish billionaire (either Bloomberg or someone else) will do a third party run as a "centrist"https://twitter.com/adamcbest/status/1160607727229579264 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It’s the billionaire class vs us/the people!
End of conversation
-
-
-
Wonder if the fate of Howard Schultz presents a cautionary example for those folks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Warren could very well move back to the center after the nom.
-
I love what the Americans think is the centre given that both Warren and Sanders would be seen as centre-left in a European context.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Despite his running as a Republican, I doubt Bloomberg would draw many Trumpers, but could definitely hurt the dem candidate. Look at how a nobody like Jill Stein changed 2016. Trump won 3 states by less than 75k votes, so it doesn't take much.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RachelBitecofer you're up -
If an Independent ran, especially someone centrist like Schultz, the effect would be cataclysmic for the Democrats according to my polling. https://cnu.edu/wasoncenter/surveys/2019-02-26-independent-candidate-survey/ …pic.twitter.com/caAymAc4sS
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
my gut, based on the number of Warren (D senate)/Baker (R governor) split tickets in Massachusetts, is that he could spoil democratic voters
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The big understated factor in the whole race is third party candidates - whether on the left or center. I think there’s a good case that Trump needs one or more third party entrants to have a credible shot at winning.
-
Yep. That's why Gabbard worries me.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.