Look, no less a critic than Pauline Kael said movies are a shallow art & what you see on the surface is what they are all about. And yet some filmmakers (ones that Kael didn't particular like: Kubrick, the Coens) work in other ways & reward close re-watching
-
-
Kubrickian intelligence and genius
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Either way they are very entertaining.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow that’s some good framing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tarantino is not Kubrick
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
occasional intelligence but accidental — we used to call him a "putz savant" an artist in spite of himself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where did you land
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends which films.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To me, there’s entertainment (Raiders of the Lost Ark, a thrill ride), and movies that stay with you, make you think about them (Bergman, Fellini, Herzog). The best Tarantino, like Pulp Fiction, is, for me, in the second category.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More more the former.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.