it's really interesting to see democratic leaders basically make the central 2016 mistake all over againhttps://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1154392109035769857 …
-
-
thats literally something you just tweeted you believe in.
-
Clinton would've won without Wiener/Comey in 2016 -- but race was so narrow many other factors could also have changed results.. Not sure if the same logic applies in 2020.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bs. Biden's platform is not same. By the general, after the Rem Conv, HRC's platform was basically Bernie's platform.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Refighting the last war you won is a classic recipe for defeat. Refighting the last war you lost is a new frontier.
-
disagree that it's a new frontier -- about 25% of left politics is still about refighting the revolutions of 1848
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
HRC didn't have any "baggage" beyond any other pol on the planet. She is an exceptional, incredibly experienced politician whom you don't like because she's female and had the occasional conversation with a bank.
-
and shes basically a Republican. That too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Except of course that Biden is to the right of Clinton, which will of course have an impact on the race.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Shouldah been here in SC after the disastrous 2004 midterms when Don Fowler, a founding Blue Dog architect, laid it bare. Their belief in this approach is impervious to data. It's a matter of faith and epistemology for them; not a data-driven interpretation of circumstances.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.