Trump is taking an incredibly unpopular stance but acting like he's speaking for the majority while Pelosi is running away from an overwhelmingly popular stance as if she were in the minority. https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/1151615273968910337 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But this was specifically to get around the house rule about calling soneone a racist
-
She can call his WORDS racist and that doesn’t break the house rules, but directly calling HIM a racist does break the rules
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
War Games: Voice of the Wopper, “The only winning move is not to play.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Context is slightly important. Was in response to a question about whether the vote condemning his words was too harsh. Paraphrasing, she meant they could have gone further with the statement they voted on, and decided to condemn the words not the man. As Speaker, a small dodge.
-
It doesn’t take into account her personal opinion. She went on to say, “...So that was as gentle as [the wording of the resolution] could be, considering the inappropriateness and the disgusting nature of what the president said." https://thehill.com/homenews/house/453558-pelosi-defends-resolution-condemning-trump-as-benign …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
is that a distinction without a difference?
-
The statement is. What it means to the people Dems need to movilize definitely isn't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This seems like a bad faith criticism, unless you also want to apply it to Rep. Tlaib.pic.twitter.com/NbRoZDydFW
-
It’s Jeet so it’s definitely bad faith.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.