1. So. What have we learned? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6VjPM5CeWs …
-
-
5. This is not to say the piece was good (it wasn't). But it does read differently if you know who Peck is and that some of the kookiness of the piece is not untypical of Peck's frequently failed attempts at stylized writing.
Show this thread -
6. For the record, I don't condone violence, https://twitter.com/sarahw/status/1149796242949627905 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I missed the byline whe I read it on my RSS feed and indeed reacted with “WTF.” When I subsequently realized via
@LemieuxLGM who it was, yes, there was a certain element of “oh, *that* TF.” But not in a way that made it any better. -
The byline doesn't make the piece any better but it helps explain where it comes from.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So your argument is that his critics just aren't sophisticated enough to see the brilliance of speculating about the sex life of "Mary Pete" because they don't read enough? Is that really the argument you want to stand behind?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.