I’ve argued that we don’t need both Brooks and Brock and could just choose one
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
or Bret Stephens.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No argument needed. It's not like he's ever voted Dem, not sure why anyone would listen to his bullshit now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The man who oozes dull till you drop.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really, does anyone?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's no David Gergen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I snarked on these guys the other day for
@mcsweeneys . They're so predictable, asking the Democratic party to abandon its traditional policies (and its base) so that the Never Trump folks can vote for a Democrat without any concessions on their part.https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/how-dare-democrats-act-like-democrats … -
Let's be realistic. Even if the Democrats did what they suggest these
#NeverTrump republicans would still vote Republican.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Are there people that think we do?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I demand a constitutional amendment giving negative 100 Electoral College Votes to David Brooks, so that everyone can try to avoid winning his vote.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.