1. Quillette is terrible. Let's go over how and why. There's the stuff discussed in this article, but also more....https://twitter.com/newrepublic/status/1139555769597255680 …
-
-
3. Quillette editor defends article and notes, inter alia, "Craniometry is not phrenology." This leads to internet satirist to mock this as "hebephilia is NOT the same thing as pedophilia."pic.twitter.com/NTGXbck7hF
Show this thread -
4. You might think that the "hebephilia is NOT the same thing as pedophilia" line is over the top but as it turns out, hilariously and terrifyingly, the major claim of the Quillette article rests on an advocate of child rape. See this thread: https://twitter.com/diannaeanderson/status/1139298621776490497 …pic.twitter.com/aJEr99OMtN
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I mean, we're getting 19th century diseases like measles back, why not their pseudoscience, too?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Do police routinely cite research by advocates of child rape?pic.twitter.com/ESIiyRz93F
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Is forensic anthropology now problematic? Surely not. I have watched all twelve seasons of Bones and there was only a single episode with a Nazi in it, and he was dead. Although that Quincy bloke always seemed a little too dictatorial for my liking.
End of conversation
-
-
-
That’s... not what it says in the picture...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.