Well, even if I did think the right's lack of cultural power was a problem, I'm not sure it's amenable to policy solution. I mean, maybe they should try winning more converts to their churches, writing novels, making movies etc. But I don't see a political solution to this.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet @mckaycoppins
High openness people are the biggest cultural producers and those people are temperamentally liberal.
3 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @willwilkinson @mckaycoppins
Where would Ezra Pound, Yeats & T.S. Eliot fit into this?
4 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet @mckaycoppins
On the right tail of the distribution.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @willwilkinson @mckaycoppins
Okay, moving beyond specific examples, I would say that before the 20th century, maybe even before 1945, almost all culture (esp. high culture) was what we would see as conservative: tradition-affirming, hierarchical & aristocratic in orientation.
3 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
It’s arguable that great artists had the temperant Will describes but the major institutions that supported them (churches, universities, aristocratic patrons) were much more conservative in the past.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
Right, exactly. I mean Ezra Pound was temperamentally very open (in ways both good & bad) but as it happened his openness led him to accept Mussolini as a patron.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.