most people reflexively opposing carbon-capture research don't seem to know very much about it, but feel ideologically averse. which is fine i guess but conflicts in a lot of ways with rhetoric that we should be mobilizing massive tech R&D like we did during WWII
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MattBruenig
and costs keep falling as the research gets better https://www.cell.com/joule/fulltext/S2542-4351(18)30225-3 …
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MattBruenig
aside from cost, most objections I've seen have been along the lines of "it will distract us from the real necessary change we need to make" but this seems to be more of a (not terribly convincing) warning than anything else
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
Replying to @rmc031 @MattBruenig
The whole "doing X will distract us from necessary Y" doesn't make sense with climate since given the size of the problem we're going to need a multi-pronged approach.
0 replies
1 retweet
19 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.