5. Of the two sides of the mimetic/fantastika it is obviously fantastika that is better equipped to deal with politics. Modern fantastika (encompassing the gothic, horror, fantasy & science fiction) was born out of the need to register the world crisis of the French Revolution.
-
Show this thread
-
6. While fantastika (Mary Shelley, Verne,Wells etc.) was trying to register the public of world of promethean technology, class war, revolution & imperialism, the bourgy mimetic novel was pointedly anti-political: a retreat into the private world of sensibility.
3 replies 6 retweets 72 likesShow this thread -
7. So it's been true from Frankenstein to Game of Thrones that it's fantastika that has consistently provided us with the language for talking about public life: Think of 1984, The Handmaid's Tale, Star Wars, Harry Potter.
2 replies 6 retweets 77 likesShow this thread -
8. The reception of Lord of the Rings offers a good example of how different political ideologies (sometimes waring ones) can find the allegorical suggestiveness of fantastika useful.
2 replies 2 retweets 48 likesShow this thread -
9. In the early 1960s, National Review editor Frank Meyer (the founder of what is now called fusionist conservatism) became a big Tolkien fan. He thought the orcs were a symbol of "the reds." He encouraged Guy Davenport to read, who passed along the enthusiasm to Hugh Kenner.
4 replies 2 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
10. Here are some 1963 letters from Davenport to Kenner, sharing Meyer's ideas about Lord of the Rings as an anti-communist allegory. Tolkien of course was pointedly hostile to all allegorical readings.pic.twitter.com/HIv93a8rnA
2 replies 3 retweets 47 likesShow this thread -
11. Kenner caught the Tolkien bug and toyed with the idea of using a quote from Lord of the Rings to open the big critical book he was working on The Pound Era. The idea being that Tolkien was a popular version of Pound's project of recuperating tradition.pic.twitter.com/NvCOoMFNNC
2 replies 3 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
12. Interesting, Kenner also notice that there was no paperback version of Lord of the Rings. He tried to push his publisher (Beacon) to do the book. If they had, they would've made millions. In actuality, the lack of paperback led to a pirated edition from Ace.
2 replies 1 retweet 38 likesShow this thread -
13. But the National Review rightists weren't the only ones interested in Tolkien. The pirated Ace edition (published using a loophole in copyright law) carried an introduction by Peter Beagle which claimed Lord of the Rings for countercultural environmentalism.
3 replies 3 retweets 44 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HeerJeet
I have a copy of the Ace edition of THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING right here, and it contains no such introduction. I suspect you’re thinking of Beagle’s intro to THE TOLKIEN READER, a paperback collection of Tolkien’s shorter works published by Ballantine in 1966.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes
Argh. You're probably right. I was going by memory and should have checked.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.