To be clear: I oppose the Catholic integralist project because I disagree with the policy goal. Practical objections seem secondary. I think their ultimate goal is impossible but they can, in practical terms, get much of what they want, as Poland and Hungary show.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But the Neocon goal wasn't merely to start a war. That was their first step in a plan to go reorder the Middle East. And they never got beyond that step. The threat from Catholic Integralists isn't that they'll succeed, but they'll fail equally spectacularly.
- Show replies
-
-
-
The 00's are different from near 2020's; I'd note that women and people of color are moving the little right wing christianists and integralists over, if not stomping them into the ground. We hope to have this completed by 2028, as we finish with
#SupremeCourt17.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Neoconservatives achieved no real policy victories outside starting a pyrrhic war and crashing the economy and are now DOA inside the movement... CI is in an even weaker position.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Catholics aside, this new Oxford Union debate is timely to the neocon part: Humanitarian Intervention | Head To Head Debate | Oxford Unionhttps://youtu.be/91WpiXu4oic
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@EsotericCD Is there such a majority on the Supreme Court? I’m not familiar with the Justice’s theological stances.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.