More specifically *their* president is above the law. They obvs would not allow a Democratic president to do this.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
After the 1936 election, the Republicans only had 17 seats in the Senate. But then black people couldn't vote for 1/3 of the seats the Dems held.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Let's not pretend all the Democrats would vote to convict, either
End of conversation
-
-
-
In truth, this only works for the GOP. Ds would have allowed removal of HRC long ago if she had credibly done a quarter (maybe less) of the things Trump has.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That does assume near total fealty towards the president of the same party. That won't always be the case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's also got to be popular with the party base
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don’t be silly, we all know that enough Democrats would readily vote to convict one of their own if evidence warranted. So it’s just Republican presidents who are above the law
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.