1. If you follow the various branches threads, there's a good conversation here between @D_Kuehn, @Undercoverhist @Econ_Marshall & others about ongoing debates in history of economics, history of conservatism, & history of racism.https://twitter.com/D_Kuehn/status/1130486961255399424 …
-
-
division of work is not just problematic in relation to history of Chicago econ or public choice. Also in macro, monetary policy & central banking, taxation & public econ ... Historians/soc get context right, historians of econ the models/tools right, problem is interaction of 2
-
that said, my sense is that Marciano/Fleury have produced research that combines close knowledge of inside econ debate and substantial awareness & context: see https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2994683 … (a paper that just got best 2019 article award from history of econ society)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
As someone who largely shares your take, I think part of problem was that Maclean's portrait of libertarianism was that of a tree, with Buchanan supported by the Kochs at its roots, where a better frame would be more of a map, with a # of different sources and trends converging.
-
That is why Quinn Slobodian's Globalists did not face the same reaction of Maclean's Democracy, even though it was a parallel project.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is @LyleJeremyRubin’s dissertation project. FYI. He can say more about it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here we go again with the "fake but true" standard. She didn't do the necessary archival research as has been devastatingly demonstrated over and over again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.