Didn’t ol’ Rummy want to invade Iraq with 80,000 to show off his idea of an efficient military?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh no, it would be no prob, they’d be back by Christmas, a Friedman unit at most.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No the other 380,000 are the American-funded and trained paramilitary Azeris and Turkmen who will greet us as liberators
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wondered this, too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not if they greet us as, um, liberators.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Um, numbers are hard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHFB40WOMOo …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’d guess 500,000 at least.
-
Invasion implies subsequent occupation. I think the general formula is 20 soldiers required per 1000 civilians - so you'd need about 1.3 million boots on the ground.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.