What's the point of this comment?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Does it require the complicity of the courts for it to be a crisis? Before that, it’s an executive snit. Congress asks courts to intervene. If the courts decide for Trump, it’s still not a crisis—just very bad. If they decide against and he refuses to divulge, then it's a crisis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because there's no one out there defending the constitution. It's not a crisis, it's a takeover.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
think it is ongoing constitutional crisis, jeer, but the question then is then what? and that is what there is not much answer. to.
-
Act II was always headed here: https://twitter.com/LemonSlayerUS/status/1109273442971471872 …pic.twitter.com/Rzi2cm687w
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There are more steps to run in the process? Watergate, for example, though parts of it ended up at the Supreme Court, never moved from political crisis to constitutional crisis.
-
The institutions were a lot less packed & stacked during Nixon's day.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The House had better do whatever they can to punch Barr in the teeth on this, or else it's basically a lost cause.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.