Nobody is urging a crackdown. She is arguing that this person has bad views. She is not saying his speech should be disrupted or the group has no right to make the bad choice to invite him.
-
-
No time to discuss whether the NYT is smearing a Jew as a nazi, haven’t you heard about the latest outrage at Oberlin?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not merely sanction but endorse and thank him for his piece
-
Exactly. What is Chait smoking?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You’re all assuming she’s arguing in perfectly good faith and not that controversy isn’t great for her brand.
-
Only chait is insisting she is arguing in good faith
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I mean, the bar she needs to clear has been set by luminaries like Friedman, Brooks, Dowd, and Richard Cohen, so...
End of conversation
-
-
-
That is the core issue here not her hypocrisy you see
@elivalley talking about Jewish Supremacy and Jews are white supremacist I would find it hypocritical on your views on IslamophobiaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not as if this is the first time she's done it. She's a hack. A dangerous one because of her position. She's being paid to do it and it's disgusting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really?
@elivalley attacks people in the most vile ways and he can’t take a little criticism? I thought his whole schtick was that we want a robust debate and people should be free to be harshly critical of others? Seems like he can dish it out but he can’t take it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.