A serious request: I would like someone who opposes impeachment explain to me why impeachment proceedings aren't required if you have credible evidence a president obstructed justice?
-
-
Unless you’re prepared to wait until the next election, there is none.
-
Well ... Shit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Impeachment...oh...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Congress has to do its investigation and present the case for impeachment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Things that make you go hmmmm...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe the answer is "there is no remedy for that". The President is not subject to any law whatsoever if he has the political power to deter any attempt to hold him accountable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Flaws in that plan... A: Prince Trumpledink knows that the Office he holds is *LITERALLY THE ONLY READON HE WAS NOT CHARGED*. B: he’s a malignant narcissist who cannot & will not accept a Universe where he loses. There is no way we have a peaceful transfer of the presidency.
End of conversation
-
-
-
The remedy is vote him out of office.
-
While he continues to commit crimes that help him get voted back in?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.