Um, Mueller didn’t indict Kilimnik for receiving polling data. Why didn’t Mueller question Kilimnik about his receipt of that data?
-
-
-
Because it’s probably not illegal?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And it's in the article he cites in that thread. Tho he admittedly prolly doesn't know the indictment was for tampering with the investigation. He also doesn't know that Manafort wasn't just "pressured," but was in fact shown evidence a judge agreed was compelling.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Remember when he was attacking real journalists a month ago....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Best way to engage with Tracey: don’t bother. It’s like talking climate change with a flat earth anti vaxxer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Me! Hey
@mtracey , you got caught lying again!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...on obstruction charges stemming from a Ukraine finance case that both of Manafort's judges acknowledged had nothing "to do with the [2016] campaign or with Russian collusion" & were "wholly irrelevant" to collusion. https://www.thenation.com/article/manafort-no-smoking-gun-collusion/ …pic.twitter.com/4cEBOy1ChY
-
Jeet won’t respond to this. He just dimwittedly parrots Marcy’s delusional propaganda. Hey Jeet, have you asked her whatever happened to the explosive evidence of collusion that she claimed she turned over to the FBI?
@emptywheel - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How long until he deletes it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.