I feel like we've gone in a blink of an eye from people arguing "neo-liberal is a meaningless term" to "actually Bernie is a neo-lib too!" https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1117187490018885632 …
-
-
Is There something you don't know?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What if, hear me out here, it’s not 1972.
-
It’ll be interesting to see who gets blamed for candidate Sanders loses every state but Vermont in a redo of 1972.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Jeet, in front of a bulletin board filled with sticky notes connected by string: Thomas Eagleton never even had depression! The whole thing was set up by Carl Albert and the RAND Corporation!
-
Sure, Nixon was at 60% approval, but if LBJ wasn't faking "dying" of "heart problems" and could be bothered to campaign for McGovern, he might have won TWO states.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You really think McGovern had a chance?! Wow.
-
But lets be fair -- if the party hadn't of attacked McGovern I suppose he would have won Minnesota and RI. Maybe.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Fortunately not happening this time. Unfortunately it's because Bernie's doing it for them.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I assume that in this particular historical "tale", Richard Nixon was an honest man who didn't have an approval rating over 60%, and Watergate was just a random break-in
-
it does take a certain amount of boldness to compare Bernie to McGovern, though. I mean, McGovern at least won the primaries
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.