wut?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it’s more a misunderstanding of how Nazism was able to gain hold. Hitler wouldn’t have gained power if it weren’t for German Mitch McConnells
-
And the big businessmen (Thyssen, Krups, et al) who figured that they’d get rid of that annoying, destabilizing “democracy”, get a stable business climate, and by then people would see what a nutter he was and get rid of him. (Nobody read Faust back then, either.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Guessing, but you mean, by using the construct "totalitarianism" to lump together Soviet Communism & Nazism?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't understand a word you just said.
-
The nazis hated socialists a fuckload That's why the poem opens with "first they came for the socialists"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Tell me more
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fair, but the Nazis were already obfuscating that themselves, calling themselves socialists to muddy the waters of existing movements, or in Hitler's words, "take Socialism away from the Socialists."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Naw, I think it's 4 decades of RW think tanks and media revising history to cover the stain of ideological similarity. They've just pushed media consumers enough to the right that the 'socialism' in 'national socialism' is enough to bypass factual argument.
-
That, and there's a goddamn legion of accountability-free, bad faith RW pundits free to push this BS with little answer in mainstream media.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.