I seem to remember Trump publicly agreeing w what Bernie had said about Hillary. So he probably went negative enough to have at least some effect on the race.https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/1114286914851495936 …
-
-
HRC was also much more competitive and when the primary was over not only stopped being negative she immediately began mobilizing for Obama. Also HRC didn't go negative against Democrats collectively just against Obama
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A. McCain might have won had he yanked on racist chains. Obama people knew this. Most of the stuff about McCain being honorable is treacly hoohaa, but in this rare case it’s deserved. B. Clinton’s attacks weren’t systemic. Made it easier to move to Obama C. Russia vs no Russia...
-
D. I’m not saying there weren’t any, but I honestly don’t remember GOP attacks used by Hillary other than mandate and age/experience. Those were meh attacks E. Hillary’s convention delegates didn’t boo her when she declared her support of Obama...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Obama is a better politician than Hillary. Also, after 8 yrs. of W, 2 wars & econ. debacle the field was ready for a Dem. It's one thing that Americans love above all else, is the "new shiny thing" aka change. It always baffles me when people ignore context.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.