As #MAGA -ites are to Mueller's statement that the report does not exonerate the president, so the anti-investigation left is to the report's account of very real Russian interference, which even Barr's letter treats as uncontroversial.
Right, but to my mind that means Democrats would be better advised to focus on the stuff they could control (Clinton campaign's strategy & messaging) rather than stuff that was beyond their control (whatever Russian interference there was).
-
-
Sure, but I think democrats are focusing on that. The question is whether the rest of us should focus exclusively on telling democrats what to focus on or engage with a broader view of events.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We act as if other countries aren't "interfering" in our politics -- and in far more sophisticated ways that the flailing Russian kleptocracy does -- all the time, with greater impact and zero publicity. And we interfere in theirs. That's the way things are done.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Prospectively, the 2018 House campaign mostly avoided the investigations, and the presidential candidates have mostly done so too. So is the claim "the Democrats would have been well-served by still more *retrospective* dissection of the Clinton campaign"?
-
Democrats excel at devouring their defeated presidential candidates, each of whom in my lifetime has retrospectively become The Worst Presidential Candidate Ever. I don't know that it's mostly done the party much good.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.