Try to think of a single high-profile person whose Iraq War advocacy damaged their careers. (I'm drawing a blank.) Democrats even rewarded one leading proponent with the 2016 presidential nomination. The only people who faced serious repercussions were the opponents. Sick society
-
-
True statement. Then again, if she had opposed the way, she wouldn't be Hillary
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
or at least the democratic nominee.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's arguable. Even granting it, she only had to wait another 8 years to receive the nomination; what a horrible fate.
-
She also had to pretend Benghazi & other atrocities never happened. Just saying.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Obama was winning g that primary either way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Incorrect. The Military-Industrial Complex and the MSM would have treated Clinton in the same way that
@TulsiGabbard is now being treated because of her opposition to mindless militarism and imperialism.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
FTAs, NAFTA, TPP not the Iraq invasion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even then, people wanted the candidate (Obama) who seemed to be the transformational progressive (of course he wasn’t). If Democrats want to win again, they need to run a progressive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.