4. This can be most clearly seen in the writing of the late Samuel T. Francis, the paleo-conservative thinker whose writings of 1980s and 1990s anticipate Trumpism in many ways. Francis always made a distinction between White Anglo Protestant core America & rest
-
Show this thread
-
5. In his book Beautiful Losers (1994) Francis located the weakness of postwar Conservative intellectual movement in fact that white anglo-Protestant core was underrepresented and it was dominated by Catholics (Buckley) and Jews (Strauss).
5 replies 21 retweets 131 likesShow this thread -
6. I don't think we should read too much into this, it's probably a one-off insult. Especially since Irish Catholics do in fact make up a big chunk of the Trumpian right (Hannity, Conway, etc). But still shows how underlying beliefs can sometimes come to the surface.
15 replies 17 retweets 180 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HeerJeet
You can't meaningfully address this topic without the fact that nobody would be mentioning that he's Irish if he went by Bob or Bobby or Robert or Francis. The point is not that he's Irish, it's that he's even less Hispanic than Warren is Native American.
11 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Is Bobby Jindal white? Because Bobby is a white name. Also, "Nikki" is not a Sikh name (as a Sikh I can say that fairly confidently).
4 replies 2 retweets 38 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
The answer to your question may be obvious to voters, for reasons that are not hard to explain. I don't think it's healthy to obsess over this stuff, as lefty critics of Cruz, Jindal, & Haley have been known to do. But candidate identity is a core of D messaging.
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Candidate Identity isn't a core GOP messaging, for a party that has only ever nominated white men to the presidency and whose current standard bearer is Donald Trump? Are you delusional?
2 replies 0 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Now, you're failing to understand the Right. In terms of identity politics, GOP voters are, compared to Dems, far less interested in the message than the messenger. We have plenty of recent evidence of that. I went through the most recent D primaries: https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/03/five-lanes-in-the-2020-democratic-field/ …pic.twitter.com/2zbMI2tkO3
7 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @baseballcrank
So the fact that around 85%-90% of elected Republicans are white men is proof that GOP voters don't care about identity politics. Because white men don't have an identity, only POC and women. White men are just neutral or human. Cool!
4 replies 4 retweets 74 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
You go to war with the candidates you have. Given the choice, plenty of GOP voters were thrilled to support Cruz, Haley, Jindal, Rubio, Sandoval, S. Martinez, & many other non-white-male candidates for GOV, SEN, etc. (to say nothing of nominees who fell short in the general)
4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
The assumption here is that GOP voters have no role in fact that 85-90 of their candidates are white Christian men. That's kind of absurd.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
Have you actually looked at GOP primary contests over the years? Your recollection of Sarah Palin being unpopular with base GOP voters, for example, is rather different than mine.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.