HRC stopped the convention momentum in it’s tracks when she stopped talking about genuine, positive ideas and began either attacking Trump or defending against ghosts.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hmmm, to me he always acted the part of a grifter, a conman, a criminal. I didn't believe a single thing he claimed to stand for - only propaganda to sucker people into voting for him. He has no values past his wallet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but the thing is that he really doesn't have an ideology
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No, people on the left were saying in in the summer of 2016.
- Show replies
-
-
-
I'd argue HRC was very well versed and spoken on her ideologies, but rather all was spoken of in the media was her denouncements of Trump. The media ignored her policy agenda, thus the electorate did, too. Recycle, repeat.
-
That would be plausible if it wasn't a perfect description of her commercials in the few days before the election. There was no policy, it was all trump bad. Seriously, they ran them 6-8x per hour during primetime.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Calling trump supporters deplorables was definitely a defining moment, too.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What part of his ideology would Clinton criticize him for? Wars? Corporate tax cuts? Deregulation? That leaves abortion, guns, sexism, racism. She probably did her best on those. She was also trying to woo "moderate Republicans" which today may be an oxymoron. Wrong nominee IMO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.