Seriously, if Michael Tracey plays his cards right, he could be in the Trump era what Christopher Hitchens was in the Bush era, the quondam leftist who wins an audience by making contrarian arguments for an indefensible Republican president. Always a market for that.
-
-
I have a similar explanation for why I still find you perversely endearing Jeet, despite the years and years of endless trolling.
-
you're both a bit odd
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I agree with that: he's a much more heterodox, independent, non-tribalistic and critical thinker than the standard partisan pundit, which makes him more interesting. But do you acknowledge you're aware that he's unpopular among your liberal following & thus easy to attack?
-
Yah because he acts like he’s the only freaking person not hysterical about the Russia shit. Like we’re all just dupes and marks for the MSM.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Psychologizing his presumed adversaries (aka "targets") is Jeet's main operational focus, objectively, just to stir things up. His main fear is being ignored, which he rightly deserves given how wretched his writing actually is. He's also usually wrong about things that matterpic.twitter.com/GjbEmj9rsr
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.