Nope. No no no. All the noes. It was precisely the fact that human rights became considered an important and sustainable component of State Department routines -- which was NOT the case before the 1980s -- that it moved up the policy queue.https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/1096043984420593675 …
-
-
Additionally, while Abrams may have made human rights an important priority, Abrams also aided and abetted two massacres and gave support to two murderous regimes that were no better (and probably worse) than Maduro's evil dictatorship.
-
The fact that foreign policy folks think Abrams is a fine public servant doesn't matter from intellectual and moral prisms because the effects of his actions are more-important than the esteem of colleagues. Foreign policy praise some of the most-awful people around.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.